The Current Order

The European Economic Community, first off, was created because of something called Bretton Woods, an American funds boost to Europe to get us as a cohesive entity. Unfortunately the same people who produced Bretton Woods were a part of the beginning of the EEC, and built into Europe the necessity for the American controlled IMF and associate bodies to have a capacity to influence the decisions. This means that the European Union is in constant contact with the American agenda, as Noam Chomsky states. This agenda is evident through the results it produces, such as austerity in failing nations with a stimulus to the economy typically aided by the American lobbyists or at least in a way to provide money to institutions, typically financial, making those countries weaker, even though their democratic system

Europe has the capacity to influence the IMF and american agenda this way, but this is only at the expense of the Americans having control in Europe. Yanis Varoufakis, an individual with prominent contact with the European union but an outsider, said that in-fact the world bank and the IMF have huge control over Europe, deciding in pre-eminent meetings what occurs, achieved through the decisions simply being passed down to the council bodies after the general direction is decided. This is not only of economic interest, in the sense that a bankrupt Europe would be politically defenceless, but likely the handover of power would have occured in an idealist guise, stating that it could end the rise of another dictator in a major country, as happened in the beginning, but it was simply to prop up an american controlling interest. Ironically (or even more scary not ironically) this could actually cause the rise of a dictator due to rising poverty levels.

Where it all begins is integration into the European union, specifically entailing a gradual commitment to its first monetary, then militaristic, then political union, but this can only occur ( as was in its design), when the European countries economically crash, as is the case with a single currency fiscal union and a capitalist global interdependence. There is also the reason that there would not be enough political will to build a united Europe, which means a descent into extreme political ideologies for the United States of Europe to be born, if the union it is born. This union would hopefully be a peaceful entity for at least 100 years, as is the way with breakdowns in peace, but would likely occur when the current union takes over countries like they did with Greece.

With the European union as a peace making process, it would be necessary for the currency union to work together, because if one fails in any way then another suffers, but for countries like the UK, we can be allowed to fall into disrepute,

but we cannot join the euro because we would fall into that trap of handing over sovereignty. This handing over of power is already at such a level that the UKs markets are tearing at the seams. Maybe staying in the bloc would seem like a good idea, but with Greece being the future of a failing European country we cannot decide to put ourselves through that.

It is the case in the bloc that they want some form of cooperation between the countries in the euro, and countries out of the euro, but this is giving them control over our politics (similar to when Margret Thatcher said whoever controls Europes' interest rates controls Europe, but in this case the UK). This is because the UK is nearly a political hostage of European countries, to keep us weak so that we join the euro.

The Germans own almost all of our railways and the french own our waterworks. This ownership is directly benefiting them to the point where our services are so underfunded that we are having to subsidise them. Industry has moved away from a once stable country. In-fact it doesn't matter who is responsible, the UK is having to rely on Londons' very shady financial services to keep its head above water.This financial and service economy is hugely reliant on imports so our currency (and its strength) are hugely important. London moving to Frankfurt is the Europeans way of saying we will take your bargaining power, our worst case scenario. These London (and general) financial services in the long run will make worse crashes, and this has a great effect on Europe. But joining the euro would plant us into more unacceptable debt unless we created an export industry fast, which would take probably as much effort as setting up a new global UK.

With the OPEC countries wanting to switch to the euro, instead of the dollar, it seems like the american defecit could be in trouble, so Brexit could be about the Americans breaking up europe as to warn the European countries that they should not try to unify against them. Brexit is also about creating a new United Kingdom, one that can have economic effect around the world, so we can create a larger country, dont assume the views of the people are what a vote is about, as perceptions about a subject can be used for political purposes, by exaggeration and manipulation by the media and people in the political sphere. This is because want an influence in the new world of social and soft power. Not only does London have potential to this effect, it can help make the British more influential with respect to how votes are cast around the world. We certainly don't want to be part of a Union that will force us to lose vital parts of our society, as these things imbalance us, and stop the soft and social power.

On the state of UK politics, the Americans socialists in the form of Momentum are attempting to take over labour, and the conservatives are being outmanoeuvred by the Europeans. This is to push both party and funding issues against the UK government and to decrease its power. This is to push more onto the overrun councils so that the UK cannot unify itself. This case so as to prevent the UK both setting up its own empire, or turning to fascism, or to set consequences for turning against the established order. With this in mind Jeremy Corbyn will be aligned to the British establishment as is set out in his Chatham House speech, which will cement him for PM (he already has social support, just not financial or political), but will he make a change from where politics is a global level? (Update: he has just sided with the europeans)

What the goal is for the UK in the new order of things is uncertain and likely to be of great controversy, to both the UK and internationally, but what I can say is that large political forces are at work in the UK and I can only say that the UK is going to get more poverty-about 36% of the population is my prediction.

The UK is certainly sticking it to the current order, but this could be an attempt by the European union to decentralise its connection to the Americans to reorder at a later date, stronger, and more stable. It could also be a way for the constitution to be re-written, since Tony Blair wrote the supreme court out of it. It could be a way for the Americans to break up the European project. Who knows what the reason is, but the public of the UK will likely be used as a political tool, and made to understand a simple idea, .

#Brexit #EU #conspiracy #voting #order #uk #government #economics #randomthoughts